bimo: (Fivey_bookish)
bimo ([personal profile] bimo) wrote2011-06-30 01:25 pm
Entry tags:

East of Eden: In Fannish Terms

Currently reading John Steinbeck's East of Eden, I can't help myself but mentally refer to the novel's Cathy/Kate plotline as "The Stephen King remix", simply because Kate, as a character, feels so much like a King character, doing King-typical things -- however written from a different perspective, by a different writer with completely different intentions, focus and strengths.

Of course I know how wrong this is, for about a hundred literary reasons. But still, the popular fannish concept of the "remixed" story seems the one best suited to describe my impression.
selenak: (Default)

[personal profile] selenak 2011-06-30 12:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Hm, yes, I see what you mean about Cathy/Kate being a very Stephen King character, written by another author.

I actually read the novel first and hence must have been the only viewer dissappointed by the James Dean version. I kept thinking "but where's Lee?", "Where are the linguistic/philosophical discussions of timschal" and "Adam isn't like that!" and "Why did they cut out the entire Cathy, Charles and Adam backstory and just leaave the stuff with the kids", and "but THIS DOESN'T HAPPEN THAT WAY AT ALL". And so forth.
selenak: (Puppet Angel - Kathyh)

[personal profile] selenak 2011-07-01 09:17 am (UTC)(link)
I believe it's actually a shame because so many of the novel's strongest scenes are so closely related to Lee in one way or the other.

Exactly. I so much missed him that I couldn't appreciate the movie in its own right until the second time I watched it.

And arrggggghh, you torture me. I can't. My September takes me to Los Angeles first, on a Feuchtwanger conference, and then on a trip through Yellowstone Park and various canyons in Utah with the APs for all our birthdays which are all in September. You'll have to write a report!